Tue Jul 31, 2007 at 06:14:17 AM PDT
(From the diaries. It's nice to see Fox so clearly admit to their modus operandi -- kos)
In February 2003, a Florida Court of Appeals unanimously agreed with an assertion by FOX News that there is no rule against distorting or falsifying the news in the United States.
Lawyers paid by Bill O'Reilly's bosses argued in court that Fox can lie with impunity.
It's their right under the 1st Ammendment
FOX asserted that there are no written rules against distorting news
in the media. They argued that, under the First Amendment, broadcasters
have the right to lie or deliberately distort news reports on public
airwaves.
December 1996, Jane Akre and her husband, Steve Wilson, were hired by FOX
as a part of the Fox “Investigators” team at WTVT in Tampa Bay,
Florida.to investigat bovine growth hormone (BGH), a controversial
substance manufactured by Monsanto Corporation.
Fox executives and their attorneys wanted the reporters to use
statements from Monsanto representatives that the reporters knew were
false and to make other revisions to the story that were in direct
conflict with the facts. Fox editors then tried to force Akre and
Wilson to continue to produce the distorted story.
Akre and Wilson refused and threatened to report Fox's actions to the FCC, they were both fired.
August 18, 2000, a unanimous Florida jury found that Akre was
wrongfully fired by Fox Television when she refused to broadcast (in
the jury's words) “a false, distorted or slanted story” The jury
awarded her $425,000 in damages.
FOX appealed the case, and on February 14, 2003 the Florida Second
District Court of Appeals overturned the settlement awarded to Akre.
In a stunningly narrow interpretation of FCC rules, the Florida
Appeals court claimed that the FCC policy against falsification of the
news does not rise to the level of a "law, rule, or regulation," it was
simply a "policy." Therefore, it is up to the station whether or not it
wants to report honestly.
During their appeal, FOX asserted that there are no written rules against distorting news in the media. They
argued that, under the First Amendment, broadcasters have the right to
lie or deliberately distort news reports on public airwaves.
Fox attorneys did not dispute Akre’s claim that they pressured her to
broadcast a false story, they simply maintained that it was their right
to do so.
Fox then filed a series of motions seeking more than $1.7 million in trial fees and costs from both Akre and Wilson.
No wonder people don't believe news--they do the same thing that politicians do--lie!